I’d like to ask first of all please let it not be that Utopia with doves
and waterfalls and soft white clothes and doors that open as soon as they are
approached
and please let it not be that utopia with all in harmony and accord
and please not that utopia of agrarian fantasy, with all of us in touch
with or at peace with the land, working the land together or weaving together
in some endlessly temperate and agreeable climate, caught in simple pleasures,
eating simple wholesome food
and please – just as strongly, please - not that techno utopia where no
one works at all since the machines - ever more clever, resourceful and skilled
- are doing everything, hidden in basements, miniaturized or concealed behind
the walls
and please not that morbid utopia that so many churches speak of or hope
for or promise, but only come the day, meaning after death
and not that utopia of absolute freedom or that of total equality
or that of the flattening of creeds, races, genders and all that into
one single humanity or brotherhood
and not that utopia of original ignorance, Adam and Eve, the nakedness
that is not nakedness no thank you
and not that utopia of free love
or boundless and open desire
or that hallucinatory psychedelic utopia of the human dissolved into the
universe
and not that utopia of the virtual, with its useless pretended
transcendence of flesh and biology
and again please, not that utopia of endless oneness and endless accord
not likely peace, or everlasting peace
not likely peace at all
and not the satisfaction of all desires
and not the exhaustion of all need
and please not an end to difference
no to the utopia determined by sense
no to the utopia determined by utility
no to the utopias of knowledge, understanding, and progress
please not the uniformity of consent
or that of placidity
no to the erasure of anger
please not the utopic reduction of human space to that of a prison in
which all needs have been anticipated, prescribed, provided for
please not the reduction of everything to the realm of the solvable
please not some temperate climate of banality cotton-woolled and
perpetuated ad nausem
not late-capitalist laissez-faire bliss
not communistic brotherhood
not either theocratic order
or rationalist decency
not some medicalised or genetically modified utopia in which all
personalities and physicalities have been balanced, remixed and extended
forever in a calculation of chemicals and genes
please not the utopia of the old and wise
and please not that utopia of the young and the carefree
please
not men and women in accord with each other in all the possible
combinations,
or mankind so called at accord once again with ‘the animals’ so called
no, not equality
nor comfort
nor acceptance
not even tolerance
we'll have none of it
a utopia of dispute might be better
a utopia of permanent contestation
anger and the unruly.
But not even those will satisfy
let’s have instead the utopia which resists all names,
refuses all belonging
refuses all place, definition or affiliation
i.e. not for us that which can be dreamed or imagined, described or spoken of
and not for us anything that can be caught in the noose of 26 letters
(called an alphabet) and hanged
not for us what is offered
not for us what is given
not for us what is promised
not for us what is even possible
not that
not anything of it
but everything, everything which is other than that.
Friends, acquaintances, enemies i look forward to our eventual meeting,
and to your full acceptance of these my most reasonable demands.
Tim Etchells, on the
train from Paris to London, the 25 October 2009.
[Written for the recent latenight program event on
Utopia/Dystopia at Frascati Internationaal in Amsterdam. Also read in Munich at The Woodstock of Political Thinking two weekends ago].
A while back, in preparation for the week long workshop/think tank project called Expo Zero, convened by choreographer Boris Charmatz at Musee de la Danse in Rennes I asked a few good friends and colleagues to send me memories of dance or dances, movement or movements - fragments from life or from dance, or from dance in life, which I hoped would feed into my work at the Expo. I already posted a few of the fragments here, and with thanks again for what my friends chose to share, here's a second installment.
It’s the look .
Fixed , blank and it means it.
A look on a face of symmetrical beauty.
Dirty beauty.
And underneath.
The legs pushing forward and the back leaning back.
Leaning way way back.
The arms pinioned in a careless hang but the face is somewhere else .
On another job.
Below its all insistence and burn but above its all stillness and stare and the low , loud sound is reverberating through the move at triple time .
Passing through the body and out.
Sound as surface to walk on.
Inside the body is whirring, it’s whirring fast .
Outside it’s going slow.
And its having trouble moving through the air, making the air cling to it-
Making me cling to it.
Not that it needs me.
The move is not in need .
Its the move as god.
Regal delinquency in action.
It burns itself past the retina straight into the gut and resurfaces at odd moments of desire.
Wendy Houstoun
("a michael clark piece but i don't know its name.")
*
Strangely (well, maybe strange for this context but not for me) very few of my memories of movement are from the formal world of dance. Moments from Pina Bausch, La Ribot, Jerome Bel, Michael Clark and other icons are there alright and will be there forever, but the first memories that hit me when I got your email were movement memories from popular culture. David Beckham’s famous free kick against Greece in a world cup qualifier still makes me well up, and is impossible to forget since it was immortalized by Lone Twin in Walk With Me in one of my favourite performance movement moments.
Seeing Morrissey for the first time dancing with bunches of gladioli stuffed in his jean’s pockets in the video for This Charming Man is another movement moment that will never be forgotten, but there’s a limit to how many times I can mention This Charming Man in response to your requests.
So its gonna have to be the memory that I’ve been revisiting recently, along with millions of other people, of seeing Michael Jackson’s Don’t Stop Till You Get Enough video back in the day. For me this was one of the last moments of the ‘good’ Michael Jackson –of the talented, spontaneous, beautiful, black Michael Jackson, before he became the white, schmaltzy, freaky, global superstar. But I – we – didn’t know that at the time. At the time this was simply one of the most exhilarating things I had ever seen – the most perfect combination of music and dance – the pleasure of watching someone ‘lost in music’, performing with every cell in their body. Look at it – even his arms are dancing to the tune in the most exquisite piece of unchoreographed choreography ever. I can watch this moment over and over and over again and never tire of it.
Lois Keidan
*
He arrived late, preferring to hit the ground running. It’s an improvised piece full of live decisions. He has been naked. He has been left alone with his eyes shut. But the moment to remember is after the piece has ended, officially. The audience is starting to leave and he’s calling them back….there’s one more dance he says…a famous dance….danced by a famous woman….a grieving woman…a woman grieving for her two dead children. And as he talks he starts to dance. He is big, broad, strong. His body moves as he imagines or remembers the woman moving, the woman grieving, his empty arms extended as though hers holding. His voice is calm and low, his own. The audience is half standing, as he describes the story of this dance, they’re on their way out, not sure what they’re staying for. He sways, kneels and lays the empty burden from his arms onto the stage. The piece is over.
Terry O Connor
*
Here's my most enduring memory of a dance movement - it's the movement
that crystalised a sense that dance can express better in words some
feelings, that a gesture of the body can communicate a complexity of
emotion.
It's from a piece by Roxane Huilmand that I saw at the ICA in the 80s. I don't remember the name of the piece. I don't remember the music, it may have been Bartok, it may have been Walter Hus.
The gesture is a simple one and I think it was like this:
with head down, moving from back stage left diagonally towards the middle of the stage, very low lighting, the solo dancer (Roxane I think), brings both arms together in a curve from just behind her body to just in front, the hands don't meet - they rest at waist height about 10 cm apart. The gesture seems half embrace, half a collecting and containing movement signifying emotion internalised, feeling collected, gathered and controlled, and isolation. It was brief, powerful and very poignant for me, for the friend I was with, it was boring.
Deborah Chadbourn
*
memory of a dance unravelled
I have never seen the show. Again. I have never seen that show again: not live, video, CD Rom or whatever, since that night I first saw it, the only time I saw it, and that woman got up from the audience and danced on stage. It was weird. I remember it vividly and yet I remember almost nothing else. It made me shake. It made my hands sweat. It made me want to leave. It made me feel I had vertigo and might only be able to crawl out of the theatre on my hands and knees. I was reduced to that childhood fear I had when my mother took me to the pantomime and they picked children to go up on stage. Nightmare. And then it ended. The music stopped. She went back to her seat. The show went on the the end. No one did anything.
Who was she ? Nothing happened but it might have. Might she not have done anything - pulled out a gun, or kissed Christine or pulled her down to the ground and punched her or tore her clothes off. Anything. And if she had what would they have done ? Because what they did - that night when I saw the show - what they did was nothing, nothing more, nothing less, than what they did every night - I guess - they just stood there, shifting, jigging even, to the music in that moon-faced, half-arsed sort of a way that defined the way they performed in that show, and that made her feel it was OK, and maybe some kind of a dance that she could join in, and then, when the music ended she sat down.
Was she a plant or what ? I never asked. Or why not, why not get up and join in a show called Stalking Realness that seems to be pretending to be an event, but not theatre, or maybe it is or maybe it isn’t. Or maybe she was a friend. I never found out.
What’s funny is how it doesn’t happen more often in theatre. Joining in. What’s surprising is how unbreakable - how unbearable - that boundary is. The more it is tested - with performers coming out of the audience for instance, or going into it, or whatever - the stronger it gets, in general.
That’s what makes theatre theatre. Whatever else it is not, it is a collective dream space. Its success is in creating an ‘as if’ world, in which performers become explorers, and which changes the co-ordinates of time and space. And when something, someone, else drops in, it is literally matter out of place, an irritant, a violation of symbolic world. It makes me physically sick.
An image from Vlatka (on a wall down the street) and a text (re boredom) from my brother.
*
Had a few of those jobs, not the kind when you can voluntarily say yay give it a go for a full 32 mins. Couple come to mind, one poss the worst on a stone crusher. Stood on this fuckin huge 40 tonne machine on a footplate while a 16 tonner swung shit and concrete in front of my face, no cage, and dumped its old oily load of bust up town of brown field site into the rollin vibrating killer jaws of satan hiself, yeah, my job mind, was to grab steel and shite from the jaws of said beelzebub, and any other foreign matter too. foreign matter. crushed old stuff for foundations of new stuff. old steel fucked the machine tho, that was the job. 10 hour shift in fear of your fucking life every time you grabbed a 9 foot piece of reo and the fucker bit it already, yeah, snag you, pulled in, lost a coat once. was wearing it, but it was me or him. hope it went in the foundation to build somewhere nice.Used to pick Brody up 6am in the van. Smell of victory v's gave it up then, yeah brode was a great plant man, fix ought, but fuck , whisky before the work. Not a tot neither. hafe bottle. Early doors hometime he was a two handed pint man for the first half gallon. steady as a rock then, nay tremours. purple drain from his face to red and then start talkin and laughin with us all. I'd be away then. Id reckon he'd swamp another gallon and then back to the favourite homeside. a drop for the mornin and a victory v.
Another Guardian blog by yours truly, this one about site visits, here. Earlier entries in the same series here and here.
*
John Cage said, "If something is boring after two minutes, try it for four. If still boring, then eight. Then sixteen. Then thirty-two. Eventually one discovers that it is not boring at all." He's right: there's a certain kind of unboring boredom that's fascinating, engrossing, transcendent, and downright sexy. And then there's the other kind of boring: let's call it boring boring. Boring boring is a client meeting; boring boring is having to endure someone's self-indulgent poetry reading; boring boring is watching a toddler for an afternoon; boring boring is the seder at Aunt Fanny's. Boring boring is being somewhere we don't want to be; boring boring is doing something we don't want to do. Unboring boring is a voluntary state; boring boring is a forced one.
Unboring boring is the sort of boredom that we surrender ourselves to when, say, we go to see a piece of minimalist music. I recall once having seen a restaging of an early Robert Wilson piece from the 1970s. It took four hours for two people to cross the stage; when they met in the middle, one of them raised their arm and stabbed the other. The actual stabbing itself took a good hour to complete. Because I volunteered to be bored, it was the most exciting thing I've ever seen.
Came across the above here, in an interesting (not boring) 2004 text by the conceptual writer and artist Kenneth Goldsmith - I also learned in the last couple of days that he's the founder of the amazing UbuWeb, which somehow I didn't know.