What was most strange perhaps, watching Dirty Work
again last night, nine years since we first performed it in England,
was that it almost felt easy - or at least *not difficult* - in the way
that the culture changes around things over the years, making them
possible, or thinkable somehow. Back in 1998 it seemed like a big ask
(or even a provocation or an affront) from us that an audience would
just listen to a performance that consists of talking for an hour; that
a piece would so self-consciously refuse to have any action, that it
would instead conjure action virtually, through language alone.
Watching the piece now that all seemed perfectly OK, a possibility
everyone in the room could admit to, a fact that left the piece quite
free to simply get on and do what it wanted and needed to do. It went
really well.
I was shocked by how *material* some of the text seems. How much
really like an event in the room it can be when Cathy says, for
example, describing one scence in the 'imaginary performance' which the
whole piece comprises:
"The dissection of the corpses begins,
in an atmosphere of unease.
Cuts are made from adams apple to abdomen,the skin is peeled back and clamped..."
Another strange thing is how short the piece feels! Just (almost)
an hour in fact. These days we'd make it twice the length I'm sure...
And with that there'd come a whole new difficulty!
One more performance in Toynbee tonight (6 June) and then we move on to the other piece First Night. See this previous post for all the details on place, dates and times. Checkout the rest of the Artsadmin Summer Season
too - there's lots of interesting work there including two projects
from Wendy Houstoun, a new piece from Gary Stevens and something from
Michael Atavar.
The stage is a dip. We're looking down a hill of rich green grass and
the performers walk slowly form the bottom at the start of the show,
coming up the hill to speak with us, the audience, as one might arrive
to a picnic and greet friends who've arrived already and settled
in some nice spot. We can see them coming for a long time. Once they've
said hi they turn around and walk back down again. There is some kind
of house-structure at the bottom, with plaster peeling on the walls.
Later they are dancing outside the house-structure and after a while
I'm making gestures to the performers that certain people should hide
or lie down. It seems important that we get a scene with one person
alone. On-stage it's the regular crew of Forced Entertainment, with the addition of Franko B who's
whole presence is not surprisingly very different than the rest, and
who I find myself watching too much. At one point he's watering a tree,
the watering can containing some kind metallic glitter. Its great but
kind of distracting.
Later still everyone seems to be playing-dead - corpses strewn
around on the grass - and a couple of performers, down there at the
bottom of the hill are slowly dragging the bodies from off the grassy
slope and off-stage. It looks like the scene of a massacre, something
almost rural. I guess related to images we saw in the Deutsche
Historische Museum last week showing Nazi slaughter of whole Czech
villages where they suspected resistance fighters might be based. In
the performance there's music playing. Its very moving - the scene with
the slow removal of the bodies from the hillside down there at the
distance and I know we're onto something - but the music is something
vaguely ethnic and lamenting and its too much, too suitable, too
cloying somehow. I'm yelling on to the stage and gesturing that they
should find something 'more rock, or maybe rap.. something with energy'
to counteract the tone. Clipse would be good maybe. Or Patti Smith. It
will be moving anyway, I am yelling as people onstage rifle thru CD's
to find something else, we don't need the sad music, lose the
music. It will be more moving if the music cuts against the scene.
When I wake I'm still half in the dream, trying to work out if the
sight-lines to a descending hill of this sort might make such a setting
practical or not.
In London all next week with Forced Entertainment
at Artsadmin's Toynbee Studios in the East End, presenting two
performances from the back-catalogue. Its pretty fascinating to be
going back to these, and a rare chance to catch them again (or for the
first time) if anyone's in London. Do come and see.
End of the week is First Night
(2001) - a kind of vaudeville gone-wrong, all rigid smiles, failed
magic and sequins. Its on the very dark side of funny I guess - a nice
reminder of the place we were in before the relatively easy-going
attitude of shows like Bloody Mess (2004) and The World In Pictures (2006). Start of the week goes even further back in time to Dirty Work
(1998) which is very stripped-down minimal, almost virtual theatre or
cinema even, at least in the sense that nothing happens as such,
everything is described/summoned in language. I guess this piece has a
close relation to some of the things that I've been working with in
video - especially the piece Starfucker
in which white text titles appear in sequence on a black screen, each
line an image involving some Hollywood star in the midst of some
unexpected or inexplicable event or scenario.
Tom Cruise on an operating table.
David Soul in drag.
Michelle Pffiefer with her foot raised, just about to place it on a step.
You can read the short programme note I wrote for the re-presentations of First Night and Dirty Workdown here. More on the line-up for the Artsadmin season at Toynbee, booking info etc here. Oh yes. Forced Entertainment now has a myspace page. Don't forget to make the group your friend. Everything is apparently internet now.
A violin case lying wide-open,
broken-backed filthy and discarded on the pavement and half-filled with
rain water, somewhere down the way here on Rheinsburger Strasse.
Late afternoon, once the obligatory downpour is done, we see the Thomas Hirschhorn at Arndt & Partner.
A sign on the door says its not suitable for kids but on my quick
inspection I miss the images that are *really* unsuitable (colour
inkjets of internet pictures showing grisly corpses, probably in
Iraq - faces shot to pieces, entrails wrapped around sticks, limbs
hacked off). We're in there already before I realise.
Its
a good piece I think - long thick lengths of cardboard constructed
'tree trunk'/ intestine/pipeline making their way thru all the rooms,
obstructing ones progress, a series of large fireplaces spew detritus
of timber and other stuff all over the floor making progress even
harder, books are piled here and there, whilst smashed phones and
computer elements (screens, keyboards, mice) are all parcel-taped to
the walls here and there and what clear space remains is scrawled all
over with marker-pen graffiti in red black and blue. A huge density to
the text itself. Slogans, out-of-context words, mad phrases, many
repeated so often that they become scrawl or meaningless scribble. Much
of it is ersatz-political press-release-ese; phrases that seem to float
around the war in Iraq - 'containable situation', 'sustainable democracy scenario' and 'regional interests'.
The rest is less nice talk - more bitter rumour, rant, paranoia and accusation; "Can't get in. Can't get out. Can't get in. Can't get out. Can't get in. Can't get out"
it repeats at one place. In another spot who-ever has been writing
stuff has given up and simply tried to cross out a wall-mounted clock
using spray paint, a big crude black X running right across its face.
In yet another there's a scrawled version of the sign you often see in
bijou antique shops - 'If You Break It You Pay For It'.
I guess that just about sums it up with Iraq.
M. came out saying 'bleak, bleak, bleak..' but he seemed to get something from it.
S. for his part took one look at the first set of extremely grisly
images (taped at intervals along the twisting tree-truck/pipe-line
structures) and looked back to me.
"Dad, these pictures are Horrid." he said.
I laughed (trying not to make it worse..). "Yes. They are.. Maybe don't spend too long looking at them.."
"OK" he said and with no sign of trouble, dismissing the pictures with the single word "Horrid"
he went back to the game that he'd already invented, playing
stepping-stones along the cardboard circles that Hirschhorn has taped
at intervals on the floor. Amazing. I found something very resilient,
very optimistic in that. Later we read some parts of the text together
and talked about it. All fine.
What I liked about the piece is that its hard not to be in it - you
are in it in fact, as soon as you step through the door. It surrounds
you with itself, with the knots of the situation, with the horror of
it, with the discourse around it, with the impossibility to escape and
with the literal problem of navigating a space that is extremely
barricaded, made difficult to pass through. I'd seen a related piece by
Hirschhorn in New York some while ago (a year or more?) and hadn't
liked it that much - I think because that one so dwelt (and relied) on
the same kind of war-images from Iraq, screaming with a voice invoking
their authority and authenticity, but also, in a troubling way,
underscoring their redundancy. In this more recent piece (Stand Alone
it's called) the reliance on the images is not so great, though they're
there in the background, like a serious toothache. Instead the
experience; ugly, disconcerting, rather total and immersive, is as much
about space and language, about ones physical presence as a
body/thinker/witness through language as it is about some kind of
confrontation with 'the truth' or 'the evidence'.
The image is one of several of Stand Alone at Hllr's photoset on Flickr. Some rights reserved (see here for info).